|  | 
| Ralph Branca, Brooklyn Dodgers, October 3, 1951 | 
My father grew up in Jersey City during the 1930s and 1940s and developed an early attachment to the New York Giants Baseball Club, which played at the Polo Grounds, also known as Coogan’s Bluff, across the river in Manhattan. Back then, baseball fans in the New York area had three good teams from which to choose—the New York Yankees, Brooklyn Dodgers, and New York Giants. Once loyalties were attached to one of those teams, the others became intensely hated rivals. This was especially so with the Giants and Dodgers, cross-town opponents in the National League. Even more than today’s Yankees-Red Sox and Cardinals-Cubs rivalries, the enmity between the New York Giants and Brooklyn Dodgers was the most intense in the history of sports. If you were a Giants fan, you detested the Dodgers. If you were a Dodgers fan, you passionately hated the Giants.
In the fall of 1951, my dad and mom were living
in Springfield, Ohio, where my dad was doing his graduate studies in theology. Dad
remained a loyal and enthusiastic Giants fan. By early October, the
Dodgers-Giants conflict had reached its peak. All attempts at diplomacy and
reconciliation were futile. You see, the Giants had overcome a 13 ½ game
deficit to tie the Dodgers for first place on the final day of the season, thus
requiring a three-game playoff to determine the outcome of the National League
pennant. After splitting the first two games, the entire season came down to
one game, to be played at the Polo Grounds.
On October 3, 1951, Dad listened to the
game on the radio while my mom, apparently less interested in this epic battle
of life and death and existential struggle for the souls of man, had left to
run errands. For Dad, things were going poorly, the Dodgers holding onto a 4-1
lead as the Giants came to bat in the bottom of the ninth. But Dodgers starting
pitcher Don Newcombe, who until then was pitching a brilliant game, holding the
Giants to one run over the first eight innings, began to show signs of fatigue as
the Giants put runners on second and third with one out. The Dodgers had Carl
Erskine and Ralph Branca throwing in the bullpen, but Erskine was spiking his
curveball in the dirt during warmup tosses. So, when Dodgers manager Gil Hodges
walked out to the mound and took the ball from the tiring Newcombe, he called
for Branca to come in and get the final two outs.
Branca was a fine pitcher. Normally a starter, he was a three-time all-star who won thirteen games that season and, in 1947, was the second youngest pitcher in history to win twenty games (Christy Mathewson was the youngest). But Branca had given up a home run to Thompson in the first play-off game, so it was a choice that may have given Dodgers fans a dose of angina. At 3:58 pm, with the count 1-1 on Thompson, Branca threw a high inside fastball. Thompson swung and hit a low line drive that sailed over the left field wall to win the game. My dad listened intently as Russ Hodges of WMCA radio announced, “There’s a long drive… It’s gonna be, I believe?... The Giants win the pennant! The Giants win the pennant! The Giants win the pennant! The Giants win the pennant!”
It was at this precise moment, based on Dad’s recollection, that my mom returned from the store, grocery bags in hand. As my dad jumped up and down like a madman, he grabbed my mom and twirled her around while yelling indecipherable nonsense of utter joy and delight. My mom, failing to fully appreciate the historic enormity of the occasion, was slightly annoyed and told him to settle down. Oh, the loneliness of being a fan.
|  | 
| Bobby Thomson home run, October 3, 1951 | 
Thomson’s home run would be forever known
as “The Shot Heard Round the World” and later dubbed by legendary sportswriter
Red Smith as the “The Miracle at Coogan’s Bluff.” It is a memory that stuck
with my dad for the rest of his life. When he died, the one memento of his of
which I made sure to take possession was his framed photograph of Thomson
hitting the home run and showing the trajectory of the ball from Thomson’s bat
to the left field stands. Ralph Branca and Bobby Thomson signed the picture.
As a loyal and dedicated fan of the St.
Louis Cardinals, I fully appreciate the elation and joy my dad felt that
October afternoon three-quarters of a century ago. When David Freese hit a
triple with two outs in the bottom of the ninth in game six of the World Series
against the Texas Rangers in 2011, driving in two runs to tie the game, and
then hit a home run to win it in the bottom of the eleventh, I nearly passed
out from excessive exhilaration. The Cards winning the World Series in 1967,
1982, 2006, and 2011 are sources of blissful memories in my life that will
forever stay with me.
But for every team, player, and fan who
jumps for joy when victory is rescued from the jaws of defeat, there is another
side to the story. In sports, for every win there is a loss. While Bobby
Thomson was being mobbed on the field and elevated to the mythical status of
Baseball Hero, Ralph Branca, who threw the pitch that led to the home run,
threw the rosin bag on the ground in anger and despair, and held his head in
shame. Just as Giants fans will forever remember the ecstasy experienced as
Thomson blasted the home run that won the National League pennant, every
Dodgers fan, especially those alive when it happened, continue to endure painful
memories of that fateful day in October.
After the game, Branca was an emotional
wreck, distraught and shaken by what had transpired from what he called “that
goddamn pitch.” It haunted him for the rest of his life. Branca was a devout
Catholic, a man of deep faith, and he could not help but ask, “Why me?” When he
left the Polo Grounds following the game, he met with his priest to discuss the
“tragic” event. He asked, “But why me, Father? I love this game so much. Why
did it have to be me?” Father Rowley responded, “God chose you because [God]
knew you’d be strong enough to bear this cross.”
Branca struggled the remainder of his life
to come to grips with how a single pitch out of an otherwise good career that
encompassed thousands of pitches could define for so many people their
perception of his worth. It was a tough cross for Branca to bear. He was never
the same pitcher after the 1951 season. “You know, if you kill somebody, they
sentence you to life,” he often said. “You serve twenty years, and you get
paroled. I’ve never been paroled.”
In Ralph Branca and the Meaning of Life (McFarland & Company, 2025), Bob Mitchell writes that
“sometimes life can be a zero-sum game, with winners and losers canceling each
other out and leaving nothing at all in between.” Like my dad, Mitchell was a
lifelong Giants fan. He was seven years old when Thomson hit his legendary home
run, and it was a moment he continues to recognize as one of the happiest
moments of his life. He describes once meeting the legendary talk show host
Larry King, a lifelong Dodgers fan. Although Mitchell had been invited onto the
Larry King Show to discuss what was then a recently published memoir that
reflected on how Mitchell’s 2015 heart transplant impacted his understanding of
life and death, all King wanted to talk about was The Game and The
Pitch. Just as that game and pitch positively changed the trajectory of Mitchell’s
life as a young Giants fan, the same game and pitch nearly ruined King’s life
as a seventeen-year-old boy who lived and died with the Dodgers. Here they
were, 65 years later, still obsessing over “that goddamn pitch.”
As Mitchell explains, for himself and King,
their different experiences of that game “formed our two different ways of
looking at the world—then and for years to come: Hope vs. Cynicism, Certitude
vs. Doubt, Ecstasy vs. Agony, Gratitude vs. Anger, Contentment vs. Envy—all
evinced, simultaneously, by the very same spectacle, the very same single pitch.”
King told Mitchell in the Green Room before the interview that the moment
Thomson’s home run disappeared into the left field stands, “I felt as if I had
just died. Damn near killed me, that Branca fastball.” Similarly, King’s good
friend, the great sportswriter Dick Schapp, once said, “When Bobby Thomson hit
that home run, my childhood ended.”
Why do sports fans care so much about the
outcome of a game? Is it a flaw in our character? Or is it mostly an American
thing? Americans, after all, are a competitive lot who take pride in winning
and shame in losing. And yet, people learn so much more from losing than
winning. Losing prepares us for life’s disappointments, and teaches us
humility, perspective, justice, and dignity. It is failure, struggle, and
conflict, not winning, that inspires great art and literature. But Americans tend
to overlook, ignore, and hold in disdain those who fail to win. Yet everyone
suffers the experience of failure.
During my first year in high school, I
played on the freshmen football team. Although I was a tall, lanky kid, I had capable
hands and was an adept receiver. Indeed, I led the team in scoring that year
(not a great accomplishment on this particularly mediocre team). But the only experience
I remember about that year was what happened in one game about halfway into the
season. We were playing Lawrence Township and, with the score tied and one play
left in the first half, the coach called for me to run a deep route on a pass
play. I made a good move on the defender and had him beat by several steps when
the quarterback threw the ball my way. A perfect spiral, it came right at me. I
stopped in my tracks and waited for the ball to reach me and, with visions of scoring
a dramatic touchdown filtering through my thick skull, the ball went through my
arms and landed like a deadened grenade on the opponent’s thirty-yard line. Although
it happened over fifty years ago, to this day, I still can’t believe I
dropped the damn ball! I joined the team during the coach’s halftime
meeting in utter humiliation and defeat. I’ll never forget the disdainful look
from the coach and the mean-spirited remarks from teammates. For the rest of
the season, I lost my confidence. I never played football again.
In sports, as in all competitive endeavors,
someone must always lose. It is as much a part of sports as it is a part of
life. But winning and losing too frequently defines how we perceive ourselves
and others, especially as Americans. Although we learn so much more about
ourselves when we lose, about how we manage defeat and struggle, our resilience
and ability to overcome adversity and disappointment, too often we hold our
heads in shame and let the noise of critics define our worth as human beings.
If the goal of sports is merely to win, we miss its ultimate value. Shouldn’t
the goal of sports be to compete, to excel, and to bring out the best in the
human spirit? Mitchell described it well in his 1997 collection of
philosophical prose, The Tao of Sports (Frog Books, 1997):
I win, you lose: so this means
I’m better than you? Winning and losing are imposters, posing as self-worth and
inadequacy. . . . Do you think you’re better or worse as a person, depending
upon the result? Fact is, you’re no better or worse than the fullness of your
effort, than the focus and dedication and enthusiasm with which you play. . . .
It is the Game, not winning the game, that will ultimately bring you
satisfaction. And losing comes not from losing, but from missing out on the
learning and the growth and the challenge.
I cannot really claim to have learned this
lesson, though in quiet moments of reflection I know it to be true. Losing and
failure remain incredibly painful. When my kids were younger, my daughter
Hannah, in seeing me become upset over a Cardinals loss, would say, “Dad, don’t
sweat the small stuff!” To which I responded, “I agree – but this is not small
stuff!” Yes, I have much to learn indeed. 
I am afraid I am more like Ralph Branca,
who years after surrendering the home run to Bobby Thomson, said, “I still have
nightmares about that goddamn pitch.” Well, I still have nightmares about that
goddamn dropped pass. And yet, the internal punishment we inflict on ourselves
is eased by the recognition that failure and losing are integral parts of life.
Failure is often more interesting and inspiring than success. The suffering and
despair of losing helps us better understand the shortcomings, conflicts, and
struggles of the human condition, and is even necessary to give deeper meaning
and context to winning and success. In life, what is felt deeply can bear fruit
only through struggle and disappointment. 
Ralph Branca never forgave himself for throwing
“that goddamn pitch.” When it was discovered some years later that the Giants
were stealing signs and that, possibly, Thomson knew a fastball was coming,
Branca experienced relief and later bitterness, for perhaps he was cheated, and
it was not all his fault. But if bitterness and anger replace agony and
despair, one is no better off than before. 
I am happy that my father and millions of Giants fans experienced the thrill and excitement of the Shot Heard Round the World. But I also know from experience that my dad kept it all in perspective. He understood that, for Ralph Branca and millions of Dodgers fans, the pain and suffering experienced from that same game, and the pitch that resulted in Thomson’s home run, were just as real.
As Confucius wrote, “A man is great not because he hasn’t failed; a man is great because failure hasn’t stopped him.” In the end, we can all learn from the example of Boris Becker, the star German tennis player who in 1987 lost a major tennis match during the peak of his career to a low-ranked player named Peter Doohan. When reporters asked Becker how he lost to a virtual nobody, Becker replied, “I lost a tennis match. It was not a war. Nobody died.” Well said, Boris. It is a perspective we should all take to heart, and one I believe Ralph Branca himself eventually understood.
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment