Friday, May 9, 2025

A Plea for the Humanities

The humanities help nurture connections within and between diverse societies, offering pathways for constructive engagement. Learning about and respecting outlooks different from our own is crucial to our survival in the twenty-first century, moving us away from tensions created by ignorance and fear toward informed, sympathetic conversation between cultures. That does not mean forsaking our own identities and loyalties, but it does involve developing the capacity to see beyond them. – Richard Godbeer, Professor of History, University of Kansas

On June 4, 2009, President Obama gave a speech at Cairo University that sought to promote understanding and ease tensions between the United States and the Muslim world. Although it had been nearly eight years since a group of violent Islamic extremists attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, the country remained at war in Iraq and Afghanistan and divided about how to respond to threats of terrorism and religious-inspired violence at home and abroad.

Obama had come to Cairo “to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition.” Increased understanding between Islam and the West was essential for peace. “So long as our relationship is defined by our differences,” Obama said, “we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, those who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity.” Obama correctly noted that Islam was replete with teachings that promoted peace and condemned violence, and that most people of the Islamic faith opposed terrorism and had nothing to do with the violence inflicted on 9/11. 

The Cairo speech served educational and diplomatic objectives and was grounded in Obama’s knowledge and understanding of history, religion, and culture. Aided by his education and personal life experiences, he crafted a speech designed to lower tensions and provide historical perspective. Rooted in the humanities, the speech sought to counter the widening rift between Islam and the United States. 

As the previous eight years had demonstrated, a fundamental misunderstanding and aversion to a comprehensive understanding of historic, religious, and cultural dynamics led to a gross miscalculation in the War in Iraq and our response to the war on terror. It also contributed to Islamophobia, discrimination, and prejudice against Muslims within the United States. Obama’s speech, which incorporated his humanities-based education, exemplified how a broad understanding of history and religion, and experience with diverse cultures, leads to a deeper appreciation for differing perspectives and to better communication and judgment. 

America at its best is a nation that supports excellence, learns from history, promotes understanding between people of different religious and racial backgrounds, and engages other nations and cultures with appropriate humility. It is why an educational system founded on the humanities is so important to a free and vibrant democracy, and to American public life.

It is also why I find the Trump administration’s full-scale war on the humanities, the arts, and higher education in American life deeply troubling. Through a series of executive orders and other actions, Trump intends to disband the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), restrict the independence of the Smithsonian Institution, and defund libraries, museums, universities, public radio and television stations, and arts education in communities throughout the United States. Trump’s attacks on these institutions include censoring historical content on federal government and public museum websites, removing books on racial equity and gender identity from military academy libraries, eliminating public support for the arts in diverse communities, and canceling billions of dollars in funding for research at the nation’s top universities. He wishes to fund only causes he considers “patriotic” or that present a glorified perspective of American history and culture.

The administration has cited a variety of reasons for its actions, but rather than propose modest and evidence-based reforms designed to address a particular concern, Trump acts and talks as if he wishes to burn these esteemed institutions to the ground. I believe his actions will cause irreparable harm to the nation that even his supporters will come to regret. But rather than provide a detailed critique of why many of Trump’s executive orders are unconstitutional or grossly misguided, I wish only to explain why public support for the humanities is essential to an informed citizenry, and a free and vibrant democracy. 

The humanities include the academic study of philosophy, history, religion, languages, and the arts, and encompasses literature, poetry, writing, theater, music, and the visual arts. Aristotle believed that a study of the humanities was essential to excellence, and to perfecting of the self. Along with the sciences, the humanities formed the foundation for higher education. Without them our educational system would be nothing more than a series of vocational and professional schools in strict service to the economy. While such skills-based learning is important and necessary, the humanities are essential to a liberal education, with “liberal” in this usage derived from the Latin word liber, meaning “free.” The term itself recognizes that knowledge is liberating and explains why slave owners in early America deprived their enslaved subjects of books and education.

It is true that humanities education sometimes gets a bad rap. Critics contend the humanities provide “soft” knowledge with little utilitarian value in a competitive economy. In the movie Liberal Arts, a young college student asks the film’s protagonist, Jesse Fisher, what he majored in when he attended the same college ten years earlier. “English, with a minor in history,” replies Jesse, “just to make sure I was fully unemployable.” It is a common sentiment. When my father learned I was taking a course my sophomore year on Native American Literature, he cynically asked, “What kind of a job will that get you?” The course itself may not have added anything to my resume, but it is one of the few courses that I remember well to this day, for it helped me to better understand Native American culture and history and made me a better and more informed person. 

And while some might argue that having the time to spend on such pursuits reflects a life of privilege and too much leisure time, I counter that it was my humanities-based liberal arts education that developed my skills in speaking and writing, the art of persuasion, and critical thinking, all skills I needed as a lawyer and that are skills desperately needed in today’s world. 

In Man’s Search for Meaning, the Holocaust survivor, psychologist, and philosopher Viktor Frankl wrote, “Life is never made unbearable by circumstances, but only by lack of meaning and purpose.” It is this search for meaning that most explains my interest in the humanities. As the years pass and I become older, the more fully I comprehend how important history and religion, philosophy and literature, art and music, and exposure to diverse cultures, languages, and traditions are to a fully engaged and exalted life. Good literature and the arts enrich our lives, help us better understand and empathize with others, leads to genuine human interactions, and guides us in our human quest for truth and understanding. 

It is why the power of an enjoyable book is so liberating, and why the joy of reading uplifts and enhances our lives. Marilynne Robinson, who wrote a defense of the humanities for The New York Review of Books, contends that an informative book “has a suggestive power far beyond its subject, a potency the affected mind itself might take years to realize.” She once talked with “a cab driver who had spent years in prison. He said he had no idea that the world was something he could be interested in. And then he read a book.” 

According to the 17th Century French Catholic philosopher Blaise Pascal, “All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” Humanities and the arts contribute to the development of well-rounded human beings with an ethical core and a moral compass, something desperately lacking in the world today judging from the current crop of world leaders.

But why should we publicly fund the humanities? How one answers that question may depend on what sort of society and country one desires. In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville perceived education and the humanities as rays of sunlight that spread democracy and enlightenment over the western world: 
From the moment when the exercise of intelligence had become a source of strength and wealth, each . . .  new area of knowledge, each fresh idea had to be viewed as a seed of power placed within people’s grasp. Poetry, eloquence, memory, the beauty of wit, the fires of imagination, the depth of thought, all these gifts which heaven shares out by chance turned to the advantage of democracy and, even when they belonged to the enemies of democracy, they still promoted its cause by highlighting the natural grandeur of man. Its victories spread, therefore, alongside those of civilization and education. Literature was an arsenal open to all, where the weak and the poor could always find arms.
Tocqueville believed that advancements in knowledge enhanced the general welfare of the community and promoted excellence. In an increasingly complex and evolving world, private means alone are inadequate. It is why public support for the humanities and the arts are historically important to a free and democratic society. Without public support, humanities and the arts would benefit only the privileged and affluent. The availability of public funds extends their reach to poor and rural communities, and thus benefits all of society. This is why grants from the NEH and NEA are so important, and why funding cuts to higher education restrict the aid available for lower income students.

Our nation’s founders, although flawed individuals, were highly educated and widely read men. These traits enabled them to inspire a national movement and draft the American ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. It is why the freedom of expression, and of the press, and the free exercise of religious belief and practice were so cherished and embedded into the nation’s founding documents. And it is why the courts have traditionally outlawed efforts to censor news reports or ban books, things free societies that value unfettered thought and creativity simply do not allow.

This is why the current attacks on our educational system and hostility to the humanities are so troubling. In free societies, governments do not dictate what universities can and cannot teach, and do not prohibit courses that express new theories and methods of study simply because they open new avenues of thinking about race and gender. Free societies do not whitewash history, suppress unorthodox religious expressions, or outlaw differing academic notions of gender identity or racial equity.

The United States remains a grand experiment. Tocqueville discernibly uplifted the humanities as essential to a free society, for they nurture and enrich a nation founded upon the right to pursue happiness. Concepts of beauty, eloquence, depth of thought, should belong to all of us. Our universities are among the best in the world because they are based on the concept of liberal education, designed to teach excellence, and enrich the whole person, and because we have supported them with needed funding while protecting their independence and autonomy.

Why should we support the humanities? Because core skills in the humanities help us develop skills in critical thinking, deep research, reading and comprehension, critical analysis, and problem-solving. Because without support for the humanities, education, and the arts, we are a less free, less democratic, less informed, and less vibrant democracy. Without the humanities, our lives are less fulfilled, and our world is a darker place.


4 comments:

  1. Hi Mark,

    This could have been an excellent essay, but then you let your naïveté of Islam and your TDS mar it so that half of your potential readership simply stops reading. It took me several tries with speedbumps like, “Obama correctly noted that Islam was replete with teachings that promoted peace and condemned violence, and that most people of the Islamic faith opposed terrorism and had nothing to do with the violence inflicted on 9/11” (I provided you the terrifying stats years ago from a source you trust, the Pew Forum, but it made nary a dent), and “Trump acts and talks as if he wishes to burn these esteemed institutions to the ground.”

    In fact, I may be the only conservative friend who powered through to discover you made a persuasive case for yet more government spending (assuming we lived in a country that was not massively in debt because of all the other publicly funded nonsense that the Left demands).

    Of course coming from a conservative perspective, and considering our current state of affairs, there really isn’t a justification for the government pointing its gun at the head of a struggling American and demanding he fork over more money to give to a college that has, oh I don’t know, 53 billion dollars in endowments! Harvard can fund its own humanities department, and you, financially secure as you are, can donate to any college you choose. As you so rightly observed, “Our nation’s founders…were highly educated and widely read men. These traits enabled them to inspire a national movement and draft the American ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution.” Somehow, against all odds, they became educated in the humanities without Uncle Sam robbing Peter to pay DePaul University.

    By the way, do you know which college has an excellent humanities department? One that our Founders would love? Hillsdale College, which takes no money from you and me, not even when you subscribe to their fabulous newsletter, Imprimus, which I highly recommend.

    So, while I agree that the study of the humanities is worthwhile, there is zero reason for the government to steal more money from taxpayers to fund it, especially when we’re broke, the colleges rich, and many of the ungrateful students who do study the humanities will eventually refuse to pay back their student loans, hoping for a president who will someday forgive their loans while laughing that it’s probably unconstitutional.

    And you know what’s great is that there is not a book worthy of reading that can’t be purchased for pocket change by anyone, as the cab driver in your essay no doubt discovered.

    So, good essay, but it would have been so much better if you left out the red meat. Your readers aren’t stupid, and they can read between the lines. No reason to alienate anyone with an essay that, at its core, is simply a plea for people to better educate themselves… which they can do without government funds and the strings that come with them… which the Left never complains about when it’s their strings.

    Regards,

    Rich

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rich,

      As with any opinion writing, the purpose of my blog is to present my perspective, analysis, and (sometimes) arguments on particular issues. Much of my writing hopes to persuade readers who are open to the ideas and arguments presented, and some of it is intended to engage readers and spark discussion. Although my perspective tends to lean liberal, this is no different than the many conservative commentators you regularly read, most of whom are doing little to reach across the aisle, as their intent is to persuade readers to agree with a particular point of view. Obviously, over the years I have done little to persuade you, although I have greatly succeeded in sparking discussion. Most of my readers, I am happy to say, based on the feedback I have received over the years, have appreciated and agreed with many of my perspectives.

      I am grateful to you for sticking it out and taking the time to read all my essays, including those that give you heartburn. For what it is worth, I do the same with your comments, which other less open-minded people might simply ignore.

      As to whether one agrees or disagrees with public support for the humanities and the arts, I wrote that it would "depend on what sort of society and country one desires." The cuts to the NEH, which combined with the NEA constitutes less than 0.003% of the federal budget, caused the NEH to terminate more than 1,000 grants, very few of which support work at Harvard and other well-endowed Ivy Leagues schools. Among the victims of the cuts were an initiative to digitize North Carolina Central University’s historical records, an oral history project at Kennesaw State University, and a library renovation at the University of Missouri.

      Although the NEH is a small and chronically underfunded agency, for the past sixty years it has helped make the humanities accessible to all Americans. It also has supported cutting-edge research and scholarship. The current cuts to NEH programs and staffing are negatively impacting many areas of American life—cultural, educational, historical, and economic—and disproportionately impacts those living in rural areas, where for many the only access to the humanities is provided through NEH grants. The same is true, of course, with NEA grants.

      So, as I indicated, it really comes down to what kind of society you wish to support. The funding at issue is relatively miniscule from a federal budget perspective, but it is crucial to the success and survival of the many under-funded programs and activities the NEH and NEA support throughout the United States. The administration's actions are very shortsighted in my view.

      Similarly, the administration's efforts to cancel billions of dollars in grants and funding to hundreds of colleges and universities (again, not limited to Harvard and the Ivies) is destroying the long-standing partnership between the federal government and higher education in the pursuit of both innovation, economic mobility, and crucial scientific and medical research. The funds at risk support a wide range of research, including on cancer, tuberculosis, and the health effects of environmental pollution. And even for the well-endowed universities, losing billions of dollars in federal funding is a problem that their endowments alone cannot solve. What’s really at risk is the core mission of American higher education.

      As the president of the State University of New York said in the publication Inside Higher Ed, “From the technology inside of your phone to the treatment you may receive at your doctor—all of that can be traced back to research conducted at America’s higher ed institutions." And all this is now under threat to the detriment of American society.

      Delete
  2. And problem solved: https://fb.watch/zxySMvg7yz/?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Constitutional crisis Sherlock?

    ReplyDelete

Most Popular Posts in the Last 7 Days