I suggest that the most significant basis for meeting men of different religious traditions is the level of fear and trembling, of humility, of contrition, where our individual moments of faith are mere waves in the endless ocean of mankind’s reaching out for God . . . – Abraham Joshua Heschel
In The Book of Lights, Chaim Potok writes about a Jewish army
chaplain in Korea and Japan in the 1950s who confronts challenging questions
about the meaning of his faith. In one scene, the chaplain and a Jewish soldier
watch an old Japanese man praying at a Shinto shrine. “Do you think our God is
listening to him?” the rabbi asks his companion.
“I don’t know . . . I never thought of it,” replies the
soldier.
“Neither did I until now,” says the rabbi. “If [God]’s not
listening, why not? If [God] is listening, then-well, what are we all about?”
The rabbi’s questions are profoundly important ones for
people of every faith. Does God listen only to the prayers of one particular
faith? Do we all worship different Gods or the same God in different ways? What
kind of God would refuse to listen to the prayers of this Buddhist man?
“If prayer is a human response to God,” asks Lutheran
theologian J. Paul Rajashekar in Engaging Others Knowing Ourselves: A Lutheran Calling in a Multi-Religious World (Lutheran University Press, 2016), “then
aren’t all prayers offered by people irrespective of their faith convictions
legitimate responses to God? Are their responses to God whether in prayer or in
their articulation of religious beliefs any less legitimate than our own?”
Despite two centuries of Christian mission and evangelization,
nearly two-thirds of the world’s population continues to adhere to other
beliefs or no belief. Christians are taught to believe that Christ died for all
people, and yet, some Christians continue to struggle with whether God is
accessible to those who choose a different path. Does God hear only the prayers
of those who accept Jesus as savior? Christians often talk of reaching the
unreached. But unreached by whom? Do we assume God is absent in the lives of
others?
In December 2015, Lacrycia Hawkins, a political science
professor at Wheaton College in Illinois, posted a photo of herself on Facebook
wearing a hijab, or traditional Muslim head scarf. “I stand in religious
solidarity with Muslims,” she wrote, “because they, like me, a Christian, are
people of the book. And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same
God.” Although a seemingly innocuous statement – after all, Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam each espouse monotheism and trace their common lineage
to Abraham – Hawkins was immediately suspended from her tenured professorship and
later terminated by confidential agreement. According to a Wheaton College
press release on December 16, 2015, the professor’s “expressed views, including
that Muslims and Christians worship the same God,” conflicted with the
college’s Statement of Faith because Muslims do not accept God’s revelation in
Christ.
The Wheaton College controversy reflects a long history of
Christian hostility toward other religions. That there exist competing belief
systems is disturbing to some. But the more we learn of other religions, and
the more we engage with and understand people of other faith traditions, the
harder it becomes to justify claims of absolute truth. Pluralism implicitly
questions the legitimacy of religious claims that there exists only one true
way to achieve salvation or enlightenment.
Many religious people are threatened by theological and
doctrinal differences and view other faith traditions as in opposition to one’s
own faith. This insecurity results in an inward focus that shies away from
difficult questions and ambiguous answers. However well we think we know our
own religious traditions, we are often wrong in what we assume about others. Religious
illiteracy breeds misunderstanding and a tendency to notice only the bad traits
of other religions – acts of religiously-inspired terrorism, for example – and the
good points of one’s own faith.
Contrary to what the administrators of Wheaton College may
think, it violates our monotheistic concept to think there is a Muslim God, a
Jewish God, and a Christian God. As Professor Hawkins understood, to accept
that God hears the prayers of all people regardless of one’s religious
tradition is not to suggest that theological differences are meaningless or
insignificant. But differences do not necessarily imply right or wrong. The
goal of religious pluralism is mutual understanding, not conversion.
I have suggested in past writings that one’s religious
affiliation is mostly determined in the first instance by the happenstance of
birth. We typically adopt the religion of our parents. In light of this, how do
some confidently claim exclusive possession of God’s truth? Most often, claims
of exclusivity are based on Scripture, such as the Christian Gospel John at
14:6 (“I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father
except through me.”). Theologians have long debated the contextual meaning of
this and similar passages and there is good reason to think the text is less
clear than most Bible-quoting Christians acknowledge. Of course, other faiths
make their own claims of absolute truth based on their holy books. Because we
live not only in a multi-religious society, we also live in a multi-scriptural
society. There is not one scripture, but many. How does one properly navigate
conflicting claims of scripture? Is one Holy Book necessarily more
authoritative than another?
I recently attended a course on religious pluralism at the
Lutheran Theological Seminary of Philadelphia. During one class, we watched a
film entitled, The Asian and Abrahamic Religions: A Divine Encounter in America, which explores
the surprising similarities among the Asian religions (Hinduism, Buddhism,
Jainism, and Sikhism) and the Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and
Islam). The film contains scenes of prayer, of worship, of wedding celebrations
and funerals in places of worship across the country – in churches, synagogues,
mosques, Buddhist and Hindu temples, Sikh gurdwaras, and many others. In
watching the film, it occurred to me that the various religions are simply different
human interpretations and manifestations of the divine. Although each faith has
adopted different symbols and styles of worship, different words to describe God
or the search for enlightenment, all provide a communal experience, a sense of
order, an attempt to more deeply understand the world and find meaning in life.
As noted by our professor, J. Paul Rajashekar, a Lutheran
theologian originally from India, the specific faith claims of different
religions are often based on cultural, linguistic, and social distinctions. Christians
often speak in terms of salvation, but this is specifically a Christian term
and there is no singular understanding of what salvation means in the Bible. Other
faiths use terms such as enlightenment, atonement, harmony and rebirth. Hindus
seek spiritual oneness. Sikhs speak of moving from darkness to light. Buddhists
strive for wholeness and nirvana. Each religion offers a view of life and a guide
to living. In reality, it matters less what one believes, than how one’s faith is
practiced in relation to others.
If we allow ourselves to grow and be challenged, there is
much to learn from persons of other faiths. To engage in dialogue, to listen
and understand what others believe, is to acknowledge our shared humanity.
Pluralism invites dialogue and engagement with others. To take seriously the
faith of others allows us to explore the richness of our own faith. To ignore
or refuse to learn about other faiths is to deprive us of the opportunity to
grow, think, and learn. Is this what God desires?
Sometimes we confuse faith with ideology. Pluralism
challenges all claims to absoluteness and exclusive truth. It is perhaps why
exposure to pluralism, to multi-religious societies, breeds fundamentalism –
particularly Christian and Islamic fundamentalism. Indeed, Christian
fundamentalism is a 20th Century American phenomenon that coincided with
increasing religious diversity in American society.
Christian fundamentalists and some conservative evangelical
Christians love to cite the Bible in support of their beliefs. But what many
refuse to acknowledge is that our understanding of scripture is influenced by
2,000 years of history and how it has been interpreted. The Bible has been
translated in nearly 2,500 languages and there are over 900 different English
translations of the Bible. Each version contains linguistic differences that deviate
further from the original sources. Similarly, religious creeds and doctrines
are merely human attempts to comprehend a mystery that transcends human understanding.
In the words of Professor Rajashekar, “Some theological questions will always
remain unanswered on this side of humanity.”
Perhaps all we can do is search for God’s
presence, in whatever form, whatever language, in light of our human
predicament. To engage in inter-religious dialogue requires courage and a
commitment to more deeply understand our own faith. It requires a willingness
to listen to what others believe and profess. Doing so may allow us to better
understand who we are and what we believe. As the late Rabbi Heschel advised,
“The world is too small for anything but mutual care and deep respect; the
world is too great for anything but responsibility for one another.”
No comments:
Post a Comment